Comparison of the prognosis for different onset stage of cardiogenic shock secondary to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

5Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of different onset stage of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Total 675 STEMI patients who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) from November 2010 to December 2017 in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were enrolled. According to the onset time of CS, the cohort was divided into three groups: Non-CS group, CS on admission group and Developed CS group. The short-term (30 days), middle-term (12 months) and long-term (80 months) outcomes were analyzed. COX proportional hazard models were established for identification of the predictors. Results: The all cause death, cardiac death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days were similar among the three groups. The incidence of MACE in the CS on admission group was significantly higher than the other two groups at 12 months. As to the long-term outcomes, the CS on admission group had lower survival rate than the other two groups. The Develop CS group had lower survival rate than Non-CS group numerically with a trend towards statistical significance. The incidence of cardiac death in the Non-CS group was the lowest. The incidence of MACE in the CS on admission group was much higher compared with the other two groups. After multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of all cause death included age, male sex, prior stroke and LVEF. The independent predictors of cardiac death included age, male sex, prior stroke, LVEF, CS on admission and developed CS. The independent predictors of MACE included age, prior stroke, LVEF, multivessel lesions, post-PCI TIMI grade 1 and CS on admission. Conclusions: The long-term outcomes of CS on admission group were the worst of all. The outcomes of Developed CS group laid between the other two groups. The consequences highlighted the importance of prevention for CS developing in the STEMI patients during hospitalization.

References Powered by Scopus

2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation

7889Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Third universal definition of myocardial infarction

2586Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock

2163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Timing of Initiation of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support and Outcomes Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The predictive value of relative wall thickness on the prognosis of the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Cardiogenic Shock

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qiao, S., Zhang, J., Kong, Z., Wu, H., Gu, R., Zheng, H., … Wei, Z. (2020). Comparison of the prognosis for different onset stage of cardiogenic shock secondary to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01583-1

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Researcher 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

64%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

14%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

14%

Sports and Recreations 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0