Deficiencies of undergraduate forestry curricula in their social sciences and humanities requirements

11Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Arguments stressing the importance of the social sciences and humanities in forest and natural resources education have appeared in the literature since the inception of the profession of forestry in America. Nevertheless, undergraduate education in forest and natural resources management emphasizes the biophysical sciences. This article examines undergraduate curricula for their requirements in various disciplines. The results of two studies show that social sciences and humanities are not well represented in forestry and natural resources management curricula. Thus, graduates of baccalaureate degree programs in forest and natural resources management may not possess the knowledge and skills necessary to manage resources in an ever-changing, complex social context. Copyright © 2010 by the Society of American Foresters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vonhof, S. (2010). Deficiencies of undergraduate forestry curricula in their social sciences and humanities requirements. Journal of Forestry, 108(8), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/108.8.413

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free