Evaluation of 4 different teat disinfection methods prior to collection of milk samples for bacterial culture in dairy cattle

10Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The first objective of this study was to determine whether differences would occur among teat end preparation techniques with regard to potential contamination of milk samples collected for bacterial culture. The second objective was to determine whether differences would be detected in genus or species of bacteria isolated from samples collected using the various methods as well as from contaminated or uncontaminated samples. Mammary quarter foremilk samples were collected from lactating dairy cattle at the University of Missouri Foremost Research Dairy Farm (Columbia). Four different teat end preparation methods were used to compare contamination rates in milk samples. Sampling techniques used before milk collection included (1) no preparation, (2) pre-milking disinfection and single-use towel drying of teats only, (3) scrubbing of the teat end with alcohol only, and (4) pre-milking disinfection, single-use towel drying, and scrubbing of the teat end with alcohol. Milk was plated on Columbia blood agar. Cultures were read at 48 h, with the number of morphologically different bacterial colony types quantified and isolated. Isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Median numbers of colony types were compared among groups using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with post-hoc pairwise comparisons, and proportional data were compared using the chi-squared test. A total of 168 cows, including 665 quarters, were sampled, and 1,614 isolates resulted. Analysis with MALDI-TOF identified 29 unique genera and 81 unique species among the samples. More contaminated samples occurred in groups 1 and 2 compared with groups 3 and 4. Group 3 had more contaminated samples than group 4. The majority of Pseudomonas spp. isolates were identified within group 2. When applying previously described niches to Staphylococcus spp., environmental species were more likely to be identified among contaminated samples, whereas host-adapted species were more likely to be identified among uncontaminated samples. These data confirm that scrubbing the teat end with alcohol after pre-milking disinfection with an iodine-based teat disinfectant and drying of the teat minimizes contamination of the milk sample.

References Powered by Scopus

Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001 - Prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance

384Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of mastitis pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Brandenburg, Germany

287Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of direct colony method versus extraction method for identification of gram-positive cocci by use of Bruker biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry

220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Diagnosing Intramammary Infection: Meta-Analysis and Mapping Review on Frequency and Udder Health Relevance of Microorganism Species Isolated from Bovine Milk Samples

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distribution of staphylococcal and mammaliicoccal species from compost-bedded pack or sand-bedded freestall dairy farms

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of Post-Milking Treatment on Microbial Diversity on the Cow Teat Skin and in Milk

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wattenburger, K., Schmidt, R., Placheta, L., Middleton, J. R., & Adkins, P. R. F. (2020). Evaluation of 4 different teat disinfection methods prior to collection of milk samples for bacterial culture in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(5), 4579–4587. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17338

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

54%

Researcher 5

38%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

47%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

20%

Immunology and Microbiology 3

20%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free