Exploring the uncertainty in GRACE estimates of the mass redistributions at the Earth surface: Implications for the global water and sea level budgets

58Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Observations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission provide quantitative estimates of the globalwater budget components. However, these estimates are uncertain as they showdiscrepancieswhen different parameters are used in the processing of the GRACE data.We examine trends in ocean mass, ice loss from Antarctica, Greenland, arctic islands and trends in water storage over land and glaciers from GRACE data (2005-2015) and explore the associated uncertainty. We consider variations in six different GRACE processing parameters, namely the processing centre of the raw GRACE solutions, the geocentre motion, the Earth oblateness, the filtering, the leakage correction and the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA). Considering all possible combinations of the different processing parameters leads to an ensemble of 1500 post-processed GRACE solutions, which is assumed to cover a significant part of the uncertainty range of GRACE estimates. The ensemble-mean trend in all global water budget components agree within uncertaintieswith previous estimates based on different sources of observations. The uncertainty in the globalwater budget is±0.27mmyr-1 [at the 90 per cent confidence level (CL)] over 2005-2015. We find that the uncertainty in the geocentre motion and GIA corrections dominate the uncertainty in GRACE estimate of the global water budget. Their contribution to the uncertainty in GRACE estimate is respectively ±0.21 and ±0.12 mm yr-1 (90 per cent CL). This uncertainty in GRACE estimate implies an uncertainty in the net warming of the ocean and the Earth energy budget of ±0.25Wm-2 (90 per cent CL) when inferred using the sea level budget approach.

References Powered by Scopus

GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system

2114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bedmap2: Improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica

1556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Post-processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data

1347Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century

906Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2018

509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sea Level Rise and Implications for Low-Lying Islands, Coasts and Communities

302Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blazquez, A., Meyssignac, B., Lemoine, J. M., Berthier, E., Ribes, A., & Cazenave, A. (2018). Exploring the uncertainty in GRACE estimates of the mass redistributions at the Earth surface: Implications for the global water and sea level budgets. Geophysical Journal International, 215(1), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy293

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

68%

Researcher 8

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 15

50%

Environmental Science 8

27%

Engineering 5

17%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0