Extending Multi-Document Summarization Evaluation to the Interactive Setting

16Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Allowing users to interact with multi-document summarizers is a promising direction towards improving and customizing summary results. Different ideas for interactive summarization have been proposed in previous work but these solutions are highly divergent and incomparable. In this paper, we develop an end-to-end evaluation framework for interactive summarization, focusing on expansion-based interaction, which considers the accumulating information along a user session. Our framework includes a procedure of collecting real user sessions, as well as evaluation measures relying on summarization standards, but adapted to reflect interaction. All of our solutions and resources are available publicly as a benchmark, allowing comparison of future developments in interactive summarization, and spurring progress in its methodological evaluation. We demonstrate the use of our framework by evaluating and comparing baseline implementations that we developed for this purpose, which will serve as part of our benchmark. Our extensive experimentation and analysis motivate the proposed evaluation framework design and support its viability.

References Powered by Scopus

Principal component analysis

9919Citations
3967Readers
Get full text
1242Citations
502Readers
Get full text

Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents

830Citations
325Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

ASPECTNEWS: Aspect-Oriented Summarization of News Documents

33Citations
61Readers

ENTSUM: A Data Set for Entity-Centric Summarization

17Citations
54Readers
13Citations
30Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shapira, O., Pasunuru, R., Ronen, H., Bansal, M., Amsterdamer, Y., & Dagan, I. (2021). Extending Multi-Document Summarization Evaluation to the Interactive Setting. In NAACL-HLT 2021 - 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 657–677). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.54

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

69%

Researcher 4

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 23

79%

Linguistics 4

14%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Social Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free