Phase-field modeling of polycrystalline solidification: From needle crystals to spherulites - A review

79Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Advances in the orientation-field-based phase-field (PF) models made in the past are reviewed. The models applied incorporate homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation of growth centers and several mechanisms to form new grains at the perimeter of growing crystals, a phenomenon termed growth front nucleation. Examples for PF modeling of such complex polycrystalline structures are shown as impinging symmetric dendrites, polycrystalline growth forms (ranging from disordered dendrites to spherulitic patterns), and various eutectic structures, including spiraling two-phase dendrites. Simulations exploring possible control of solidification patterns in thin films via external fields, confined geometry, particle additives, scratching/piercing the films, etc. are also displayed. Advantages, problems, and possible solutions associated with quantitative PF simulations are discussed briefly. © 2013 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International.

References Powered by Scopus

2174Citations
572Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Quantitative phase-field modeling of dendritic growth in two and three dimensions

1366Citations
467Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Science and engineering of casting solidification: Third edition

206Citations
477Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gránásy, L., Rátkai, L., Szállás, A., Korbuly, B., Tóth, G. I., Környei, L., & Pusztai, T. (2014). Phase-field modeling of polycrystalline solidification: From needle crystals to spherulites - A review. In Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science (Vol. 45, pp. 1694–1719). Springer Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-013-1988-0

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

51%

Researcher 20

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 26

46%

Physics and Astronomy 13

23%

Engineering 12

21%

Chemistry 5

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0