Factor structure and measurement invariance for the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ) among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer

8Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Given that emotion regulation counts for much in breast cancer, it is important to fully understand its construct. The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ) is a widely applied instrument for measuring conscious cognitive coping strategies in both general and clinical samples; however, there are no data on its factor structure in women with breast cancer, not to mention evidence of measurement invariance (MI) across sociodemographic variables. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to examine the latent factor structure and MI between different sociodemographic groups for CERQ in specific patients. Methods: The sample consisted of 1032 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, with a mean age of 47.54 years (SD = 8.51). The latent factor structure for CERQ was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Further, MI various sociodemographic variables was evaluated by a series of multiple-group CFA process. Results: The nine-factor CFA model was an adequate fit for the data collected in women with breast cancer. Also, this nine-factor structure had strong factorial invariance across age, place of residence, educational levels, and employment status. Conclusion: This study firstly examined the latent factor structure for CERQ among Chinese women with malignancy and MI across various sociodemographic variables, which deepens the understanding of the construct for CERQ as a useful tool for assessing patients' conscious cognitive component of emotion regulation based on self-report.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, L., Li, S., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhu, X. (2019). Factor structure and measurement invariance for the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ) among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free