Covid-19 and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR—facts and fallacies

20Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although molecular testing, and RT-qPCR in particular, has been an indispensable component in the scientific armoury targeting SARS-CoV-2, there are numerous falsehoods, misconceptions, assumptions and exaggerated expectations with regards to capability, performance and usefulness of the technology. It is essential that the true strengths and limitations, although publicised for at least twenty years, are restated in the context of the current COVID-19 epidemic. The main objective of this commentary is to address and help stop the unfounded and debilitating speculation surrounding its use.

References Powered by Scopus

A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019

20079Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments

12362Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

5389Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Variability in RT-qPCR assay parameters indicates unreliable SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification for wastewater surveillance

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recent review of COVID-19 management: diagnosis, treatment and vaccination

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rapid and Unamplified Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA via CRISPR-Cas13a-Modified Solution-Gated Graphene Transistors

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bustin, S., Mueller, R., Shipley, G., & Nolan, T. (2021). Covid-19 and diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR—facts and fallacies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052459

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

51%

Researcher 9

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 14

44%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

28%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

16%

Engineering 4

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 29

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free