Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers

29Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

No reliable anatomical or functional alterations have been confirmed in psychiatric neuroimaging; however it can become reliable with translational impact on clinical practice when considering crucial methodological issues. We provide guidelines to authors, editors and reviewers in the implementation/evaluation of neuroimaging studies to bend neuroimaging to be more than basic neuroscience. © 2012 Borgwardt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borgwardt, S., Radua, J., Mechelli, A., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2012, September 1). Why are psychiatric imaging methods clinically unreliable? Conclusions and practical guidelines for authors, editors and reviewers. Behavioral and Brain Functions. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-8-46

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free