PERADILAN KASUS GRATIFIKASI HARINI WIJOSO . (SEBUAH ANALISIS-KRITIS)

  • Junaedi J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AbstrakThe author elaborates concerning the corruption case's which involvedformer judge Harini Wijoso whom acting her recent advocate jobs forProbosutedjo as the accused corruption's actor. The advocate here thenbecomes accused also by doing corruption practices on bribery ways. In thecourt 's session the accusation of public prosecutors to Harini have reflectedthe criminal effords. Under Indonesian Criminal Law its classified asformeel delicten' (formal offensive) which then has qualified Probosutedjoas the involved aclor of crime perfomers. In fact then Corruption EradicationComission (KPK) has overulled through Probosutedjo as the accused. Theauthor here has thought that Probosutedjo is not the whistle blower byhimself involved on criminal conduct's, In this case the KPK have practicedinconsistency and abuse du droit by considering that KPK haven'tauthorized to suspend the investigation or due process of prosecution

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Junaedi, J. (2007). PERADILAN KASUS GRATIFIKASI HARINI WIJOSO . (SEBUAH ANALISIS-KRITIS). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 37(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol37.no1.146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free