Recent explanations of social problems have increasingly adopted the "definitional" perspective. This paper provides a critical commentary on the form of sociological expla- nation common to this approach. Viewed as a practical accomplishment, both theoret- ical statements and empirical case studies manipulate a boundary, making certain phenomena problematic while leaving others unproblematic. We call the main strategy for managing this boundary ontological gerrymandering. After applying this concept to both theoretical and empirical studies of social problems, we show that the same conceptual problems arise with respect to the labeling theory of deviance. We argue that investigation of the practical management of these problems will contribute to a deeper understanding both of social problems and sociological explanation more generally.
CITATION STYLE
Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations. Social Problems, 32(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/800680
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.