The vatican and the white house

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While George W. Bush was president, Washington and the Vatican were in agreement on most 'culture of life' issues and at odds over the war in Iraq. With the 2008 election of Barack Obama, the set of agreements and disagreements has been reversed. There is now substantial common ground on foreign policy, immigration and fighting poverty, but none on gay rights, stem-cell research or abortion. But the Vatican sees Obama as the most secular president in many years. In the Holy See's unofficial view, Obama lacks a religious vision and might prove to be a cultural adversary. But this picture of the new president as ideologically suspect or supportive of moral relativism is false and misleading. To Obama, relativism means putting back together a fragmented American society, and promoting unity in diversity. Being a relativist is not a handicap but an opportunity: a necessary tool for exercising leadership. This has required a revolutionary rethinking of the Vatican's approach to the White House. The relationship has been transformed from an ideological alliance into a pragmatic one.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franco, M. (2010). The vatican and the white house. Survival, 52(3), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2010.494877

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free