Using neural network as a screening and educational tool for abnormal glucose tolerance in the community

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Accurate, simple and non-invasive tools are needed for efficient screening of abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) and educating the general public. Aim: To develop a neural network-based initial screening and educational model for AGT. Data and methods 230 subjects with AGT and 3,243 subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were allocated into training, validation and test sets using stratified randomization. The ratios of AGT versus NGT in three groups were 150:50, 30:570 and 50:950, respectively. A feed-forward neural network (FFNN) was trained to predict 2-hour plasma glucose of 75g Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) using age, family history of diabetes, weight, height, waist and hip circumference. The screening performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and the partial AUC (in the range of false positive rates between 35 and 65%) and compared to those from logistic regression, linear regression and ADA Risk Test. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and percentage that needed further testing at 7.2mmol/L in test group were 90.0 %(95%CI: 78.6 to 95.7%), 47.7% (95%CI: 44.5 to 50.9%), 49.8% (95%CI: 46.7 to 52.9%) and 54.2% (95%CI: 51.1 to 57.3%) respectively. The entire and partial AUCs were 0.70 (95%CI: 0.62 to 0.78) and 0.26 (95%CI: 0.22 to 0.30). The partial AUC of the NN was higher than those of logistic regression (p=0.06), linear regression (p=0.06) and ADA Risk Test (P=0.006). Conclusion: NN can be used as a high-sensitive and non-invasive initial screening and educational tool for AGT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gao, W., Dong, F., Nie, S., & Shi, L. (2010). Using neural network as a screening and educational tool for abnormal glucose tolerance in the community. Archives of Public Health, 68(4), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1186/0778-7367-68-4-143

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free