Facework and prosocial teasing in a synchronous video communication exchange

3Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study centres on the analysis of prosocial teasing during a videoconference (telecollaboration) exchange between mixed-gender adolescent secondary school students from Spain and Germany. We contend that the provocative elements present in prosocial teasing activate a play frame, in Gregory Bateson's terms, in which seemingly hostile face acts can be interpreted as playful behaviour. We argue that successful teasing can ultimately enhance the face of the teaser and that of the person being teased and thus build up rapport between them. Our analysis of the facework in the interaction during this telecollaboration exchange is based on Erwin Goffman's notions of face, demeanour and deference and stands in opposition to the dominant (im)politeness paradigm put forward by Jonathan Culpeper, which has its roots in Penelope Brown and Stephen C. Levinson's seminal work.

References Powered by Scopus

On Face-Work

1752Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Politeness

1370Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence

978Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Virtual exchanges among primary-education pupils Insights into a new arena

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Goals, Power and Similarity: Responses to Banter in Initial Interactions

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of research on telecollaboration in english as a foreign and second language learning contexts

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pennock-Speck, B., & Clavel-Arroitia, B. (2019). Facework and prosocial teasing in a synchronous video communication exchange. Atlantis, 41(2), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2019-41.2.02

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

38%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 10

53%

Social Sciences 5

26%

Arts and Humanities 3

16%

Psychology 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free