Validity study of head and neck flexion-extension motion comparing measurements of a pendulum goniometer and roentgenograms

15Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Physical therapists measure head and neck flexion-extension with goniometers, assuming that such measures are an accurate appraisal of joint motion. The only universally accepted, reliable, and objective method of measuring joint motion, however, is by roentgenograms, which have potentially harmful effects and are too expensive to be used routinely for assessing changes in motion. A method is discussed for computing head-tilt on neck and neck flexion-extension motion from roentgenograms. Radiographic measures were compared to pendulum goniometer measures for total head and neck motion (i.e., head-tilt on neck plus neck motion in both the flexed and extended positions) showing good correlation (Pearson=0.97) and good agreement [intraclass correlation (ICC)=0.98] between measures. This study validated that the pendulum goniometer and roentgenograms obtain the same measures for head and neck motion in the sagittal plane.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herrmann, D. B. (1990). Validity study of head and neck flexion-extension motion comparing measurements of a pendulum goniometer and roentgenograms. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 11(9), 414–418. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1990.11.9.414

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free