Neural basis of nonanalytical reasoning expertise during clinical evaluation

17Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding clinical reasoning is essential for patient care and medical education. Dual-processing theory suggests that nonanalytic reasoning is an essential aspect of expertise; however, assessing nonanalytic reasoning is challenging because it is believed to occur on the subconscious level. This assumption makes concurrent verbal protocols less reliable assessment tools. Methods: Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to explore the neural basis of nonanalytic reasoning in internal medicine interns (novices) and board-certified staff internists (experts) while completing United States Medical Licensing Examination and American Board of Internal Medicine multiple-choice questions. Results: The results demonstrated that novices and experts share a common neural network in addition to nonoverlapping neural resources. However, experts manifested greater neural processing efficiency in regions such as the prefrontal cortex during nonanalytical reasoning. Conclusions: These findings reveal a multinetwork system that supports the dual-process mode of expert clinical reasoning during medical evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Durning, S. J., Costanzo, M. E., Artino, A. R., Graner, J., van der Vleuten, C., Beckman, T. J., … Schuwirth, L. (2015). Neural basis of nonanalytical reasoning expertise during clinical evaluation. Brain and Behavior, 5(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.309

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free