Adherence to multiple cancer screening tests among women living in Appalachia Ohio

23Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of information about the correlates of completing all three cancer screening tests among women living in Appalachia. Methods: Cross-sectional telephone interviews were conducted (April-September 2013) among women (n = 637) ages 51 to 75 years from 12 Appalachia Ohio counties. Outcomes of within screening guidelines were verified by medical records. Multivariable logistic regression models identified correlates of being within guidelines for all three cancer screening tests. Results: Screening rates included mammography (32.1%), Pap test (36.1%), and a colorectal cancer test (30.1%). Only 8.6% of women were within guidelines for all tests. Having had a check-up in the past 2 years and having received a screening recommendation were significantly related to being within guidelines for all three tests (P < 0.01). Participants with higher annual household incomes [$60,000+; OR, 3.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.49-8.33] and conditions requiring regular medical visits (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.29-7.74) were more likely to be within guidelines for all three screening tests. Conclusion: Less than 10% of women had completed screening within guidelines for all three screening tests. Regular contact with the health care system and higher incomes were significant predictors of being within guidelines. Impact: Within guidelines rates for the three recommended cancer screening tests are low among women in Appalachia Ohio. This finding illustrates the need for innovative interventions to improve rates of multiple cancer screening tests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katz, M. L., Reiter, P. L., Young, G. S., Pennell, M. L., Tatum, C. M., & Paskett, E. D. (2015). Adherence to multiple cancer screening tests among women living in Appalachia Ohio. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 24(10), 1489–1494. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0369

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free