The metaphor of nature as a book, and its reading, has arisen in many forms in theological discussions of natural philosophy from ancient to modern periods. It is far less fixed in form than often assumed, however, but reflects cultural contextual shape. It is also too often recruited without challenge, although the implied analogies of authorship, narrative shape, and hermeneutic contain many pitfalls. I explore four flaws in the ‘Book of Nature’ narrative, finding that they are connected with two related and troublesome tensions – that of ‘methodological naturalism’ within a theistic framework, and the redundancy of ‘natural theology’ in its 19th century form. Approaching a theology of science from the perspective of the Wisdom tradition offers a fresh conception of who does the writing, and reading, of nature’s living book.
CITATION STYLE
McLeish, T. C. B. (2020). Beyond the ‘Book of Nature’ to Science as Second Person Narrative: From Methodological Naturalism to Teleological Transcendence (pp. 131–142). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31182-7_11
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.