Waste Analysis in the Speaker Box Assy Process to Reduce Lead Time in the Electronic Musical Instrument Industry

3Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyse the waste in the production line to get an efficient production lead time. Methodology/Approach: This research uses the integration method of value stream mapping and kaizen. Based on the analysis with expert judgment, it is known that the waste comes from an inefficient factory layout. Improvements by making changes to factory layouts and merging workstations. Findings: This research has found waste caused by ineffective factory layouts based on Focus Group Discussions (FGD). Improvements by incorporating workstations and changes to the factory layout can reduce production lead time. The results showed that the production lead time decreased from 3.21 days to 2.31 days or a decrease in the ratio of 31.15%. Research Limitation/Implication: This research can also improve manufacturing performance such as cost efficiency, efficient layout, and labour reduction. So for similar companies, this research can be a reference for making improvements in reducing waste that can improve manufacturing performance so that they can compete in national and international markets. Originality/Value of paper: This paper provides benefits for the musical instrument industry regarding waste reduction. According to this research, lean production can increase the productivity and quality of the production system, because it can eliminate the waste of time or the production process. The new approach of this research is used the integration methods by involving experts through FGDs to make improvements and reduce waste in the production line.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aprianto, T., Nuryono, A., Setiawan, I., Kurnia, H., & Purba, H. H. (2022). Waste Analysis in the Speaker Box Assy Process to Reduce Lead Time in the Electronic Musical Instrument Industry. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 26(3), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v26i3.1744

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free