Reliability of the Respiratory Movement Measuring Instrument, RMMI

21Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: A new instrument to measure breathing movements, Respiratory Movement Measuring Instrument (RMMI), has been developed. There is still a lack of knowledge about the reliability of the instrument. Objectives: The aim was to investigate reliability of the RMMI. Methods: In this trial, RMMI (ReMo Inc. Keldnaholt, Reykjavik, Iceland) was used. Inter- and intrarater reliability was performed on 30 volunteers who were tested three times in the supine position. Two of the tests were performed by one of the authors and the third test by the other. Intrasubject reliability was tested on 10 volunteers 12 times randomly during 1 h. Intra-instrument reliability was performed by measuring 12 solid surfaces where the instrument was placed horizontally against a couch or vertically against a chair. Results: Intra-rater reliability: The correlations were moderate to strong (r = 0·54-0·94) except for the left lower thoracic position r = 0·35. Inter-rater reliability: The correlations were strong (r = 0·71-0·99) except for the left lower thoracic position r = 0·35. The strongest correlations were seen on the tests on abdominal breathing movements. Intra subject reliability: The over-all difference within and between the participants and test was non-significant (P = 0·98). The average difference between the tests was 1·4 mm. Intra instrument: The differences between the measurements were small (mean 0·15 mm). The over-all difference was non-significant (P = 0·79). Conclusion: The RMMI is a reliable instrument and usable in both clinical practice and research. © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olsén, M. F., & Romberg, K. (2010). Reliability of the Respiratory Movement Measuring Instrument, RMMI. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 30(5), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00951.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free