The Plastic Surgery Common Application: Improving Efficiency and Reducing Inequity in the Application Process

Abstract

The residency application process is expensive, costing an average of $2149 in application fees per applicant during the 2020-2021 cycle. Additionally, the number of applications per applicant continues to rise annually across all specialties. This considerable cost creates a financial barrier for students, particularly those from first-generation and underrepresented backgrounds. Moreover, the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application generates a lengthy, diluted output that hinders a holistic review. We developed the Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA), a focused, specialty-specific application external to ERAS with the goal of lessening the financial barrier for students and improving reviewer satisfaction. The PSCA was revised over a 5-month period after prepiloting with stakeholders. All integrated plastic surgery programs were invited to participate. Of the 86 plastic surgery programs, 20 agreed to participate in the pilot, accepting both ERAS and PSCA for direct comparison. A total of 181 completed applications were received through the PSCA. In a postparticipation survey, most applicants and reviewers felt that the PSCA offered a reasonable alternative to ERAS, despite minor technical difficulties. The PSCA pilot demonstrates that there is a reasonable alternative to applying to residency through ERAS and offers a template for developing a system that is not cost-prohibitive to applicants. The PSCA also demonstrates the benefit of a specialty-specific, customizable application for reviewer efficiency and satisfaction.