The influence of androgen deprivation therapy on prostate size and voiding symptoms in prostate cancer patients in Korea

9Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on total prostate volume and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Methods: Between January 2007 and June 2014, 110 patients who received androgen deprivation treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical parameters and urodynamic parameters along with changes at follow-up were analyzed. Factors such as reduction in prostate volume, changes in LUTS, and prostate volume tertiles were compared 1 year after ADT. Results: After ADT, the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score decreased from 17.45 to 12.21 and the IPSS voiding subscore decreased from 9.16 to 6.24. Maximal uroflow rate increased from 8.62 to 11.50 mL/sec and residual urine also reduced significantly by 29.34 mL. Change in prostate size was more prominent (-51.14%) in the patients with less than 1 year of ADT (n=21) than those who had more than 1 year of treatment (n=89, -44.12%). The decrease in the IPSS voiding subscore was greater within 1 year of ADT than after 1 year of treatment (-4.10 vs. -2.65). The differences were more significant in the 30-50 g group (n=59) and > 50 g group (n=11) than the < 30 g group (n=40) of the IPSS voiding subscore improvement (-3.76, -4.91 vs. -2.10), and maximal uroflow rate improvement (2.78, 2.90 vs 1.49). Conclusion: ADT resulted in statistically significant clinical improvement in terms of prostate volume, urodynamic parameters, and LUTS for patients with prostate cancer when analyzed by ADT duration and prostate volume.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, H., Chung, H., Park, J. Y., Lee, J. G., & Bae, J. H. (2016). The influence of androgen deprivation therapy on prostate size and voiding symptoms in prostate cancer patients in Korea. International Neurourology Journal, 20(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.1632628.314

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free