Earthquake protection for high-speed rail traffic: Risky business?

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For earthquake protection of structures (such as bridges, viaducts and embankments), a precise and safe dimensioning has to be calculated according to the soil profile, the location of potentially active faults, and the local liquefaction risk, as they all influence the damaging potential of seismic waves. In many European countries, these measures are considered to be sufficient for structures to withstand earthquakes and to guarantee a proper level of safety (i.e. avoiding a collapse of the structures). High-speed rail lines, however, have very strict limits regarding the position of the track to continue a safe support and guiding of trains running at speeds of 300 km/h or more. Even if structures have not collapsed, or landslides have not occurred, the track position after an earthquake can be beyond the limits for safe running at 300 km/h. This study shows that different countries deal with these strict limits in different ways. © 2009 WIT Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vecchiato, S., Rascol, E., & Zwanenburg, W. J. (2009). Earthquake protection for high-speed rail traffic: Risky business? In WIT Transactions on the Built Environment (Vol. 108, pp. 507–516). https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE090471

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free