Fast trabecular bone strength predictions of HR-pQCT and individual trabeculae segmentation-based plate and rod finite element model discriminate postmenopausal vertebral fractures

31Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) has advanced clinical assessment of trabecular bone microstructure, nonlinear microstructural finite element (μFE) prediction of yield strength using a HR-pQCT voxel model is impractical for clinical use due to its prohibitively high computational costs. The goal of this study was to develop an efficient HR-pQCT-based plate and rod (PR) modeling technique to fill the unmet clinical need for fast bone strength estimation. By using an individual trabecula segmentation (ITS) technique to segment the trabecular structure into individual plates and rods, a patient-specific PR model was implemented by modeling each trabecular plate with multiple shell elements and each rod with a beam element. To validate this modeling technique, predictions by HR-pQCT PR model were compared with those of the registered high-resolution micro-computed tomography (HR-μCT) voxel model of 19 trabecular subvolumes from human cadaveric tibia samples. Both the Young's modulus and yield strength of HR-pQCT PR models strongly correlated with those of μCT voxel models (r2 = 0.91 and 0.86). Notably, the HR-pQCT PR models achieved major reductions in element number (>40-fold) and computer central processing unit (CPU) time (>1200-fold). Then, we applied PR model μFE analysis to HR-pQCT images of 60 postmenopausal women with (n = 30) and without (n = 30) a history of vertebral fracture. HR-pQCT PR model revealed significantly lower Young's modulus and yield strength at the radius and tibia in fracture subjects compared to controls. Moreover, these mechanical measurements remained significantly lower in fracture subjects at both sites after adjustment for areal bone mineral density (aBMD) T-score at the ultradistal radius or total hip. In conclusion, we validated a novel HR-pQCT PR model of human trabecular bone against μCT voxel models and demonstrated its ability to discriminate vertebral fracture status in postmenopausal women. This accurate nonlinear μFE prediction of the HR-pQCT PR model, which requires only seconds of desktop computer time, has tremendous promise for clinical assessment of bone strength. Copyright © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

References Powered by Scopus

Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique

3126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information

1971Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography

1057Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Modelling of bone fracture and strength at different length scales: A review

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trabecular plates and rods determine elastic modulus and yield strength of human trabecular bone

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Subchondral Trabecular Rod Loss and Plate Thickening in the Development of Osteoarthritis

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, X. S., Wang, J., Zhou, B., Stein, E., Shi, X., Adams, M., … Guo, X. E. (2013). Fast trabecular bone strength predictions of HR-pQCT and individual trabeculae segmentation-based plate and rod finite element model discriminate postmenopausal vertebral fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 28(7), 1666–1678. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1919

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

69%

Researcher 12

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 18

46%

Medicine and Dentistry 18

46%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

5%

Computer Science 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0