Bilateral cochlear implantation is regarded as very beneficial: results from a worldwide survey by online questionnaire

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Bilateral cochlear implant (CI) provision is now widely regarded as the most beneficial hearing intervention for acceptable candidates. This study sought to determine if a number of well-regarded hearing professionals at highly reputable clinics shared similar practices and beliefs regarding bilateral CI provision, use, and rehabilitation in children and adults. Methods: An 11-question online questionnaire was created and distributed to all 27 clinics in the HEARRING group. Questions 1–5 asked for facts; questions 6–11 asked for opinions. Results: 20 completed questionnaires were returned. All 20 respondents reported that their clinics perform bilateral cochlear implantation in children; 18 do so in adults. Regarding the fact-based questions, bilateral CI provision is more commonly performed and more likely to be reimbursed in children than in adults. Children are also much more likely to be implanted simultaneously than are adults. Regarding the opinion-based questions, respondents gave broadly similar answers. Communication between the CIs and speech coding strategies specifically developed for bilateral CI users were regarded as the two future technologies that would most enhance the benefit of bilateral CI use. Conclusions: Most clinics in the HEARRING group are very familiar with bilateral CI provision and hold similar opinions on its results and benefits. Hopefully the results described herein will lead to a greater acceptance and regular reimbursement of bilateral CI provision, especially in adults.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rak, K., Völker, J., Schendzielorz, P., Shehata-Dieler, W., Radeloff, A., & Hagen, R. (2019). Bilateral cochlear implantation is regarded as very beneficial: results from a worldwide survey by online questionnaire. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 276(3), 679–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-05271-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free