Wilhelm Reich: Vitalism and Its Discontents

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In order to understand the work of the radical psychiatrist Wilhelm Reich in wider context, I ask whether or not he can be considered a vitalist. Beginning with some brief discussion of the idea of vitalism, this chapter moves to look at Reich’s seminal writings and the details of his life in an effort to properly situate him in the context of the vitalist tradition. I argue that Reich encountered deep resistance to, and criticism of, his ideas, and his role as an outsider in relationship to mainstream psychological paradigms was coveted but also unavoidable. Not only does Reich clearly fit into the vitalist paradigm – understanding him in these terms actually helps explain why he struggled for legitimacy and recognition in the psychiatric field throughout his career. Regardless of this peripheral role, or perhaps because of it, much interest remains in Reich’s thought, and his insights can still give us a more nuanced sense of sexuality and its relationship to life, spirituality, society and politics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Normandin, S. (2013). Wilhelm Reich: Vitalism and Its Discontents. In History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 179–204). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2445-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free