The comparison of the accuracy of temporary crowns fabricated with several 3D printers and a milling machine

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of various 3D printers and a milling machine. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The die model was designed using CAD (Autodesk Inventor 2018 sp3). The 30 μm cement space was given to the die and the ideal crown of the mandibular left first molar was designed using CAD (ExoCAD). The crowns were produced using the milling machine (Imes-icore 250i) and the 3D printers (Zenith U, Zenith D, W11) and they were divided into four groups. In all groups, the interior of each crown was scanned (Identica blue) and superimposed (Geomagic Control X) with the previously designed die. The difference between the die and the actual crown was measured at specific points. The Kruskal-Wallis test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Bonferroni’s method were performed with a statistical analysis software (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, J., Ju, S., Kim, J., Hwang, S., & Ahn, J. (2023). The comparison of the accuracy of temporary crowns fabricated with several 3D printers and a milling machine. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 15(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.72

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free