Towards an analysis of the epistemic frameworks of big data

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we explore some epistemological discussions about big data. As our main epistemological concept, we use the notion of Epistemic Framework formulated by Piaget and García, and reviewed by us in more recent works, which seeks to problematize the conditioning of ethical and political values, as well as other regulations, in the development of scientific knowledge. We propose to order the debates in the recent literature on big data through various dualities, such as data/interpretation, automatic/non-automatic, or causality/correlation, around which it is possible to view two specific epistemic frameworks, tending to split these terms, or to their integration. On this last mode of focusing the debates, we identify some epistemological challenges of research with big data, especially in the computational social sciences.

References Powered by Scopus

Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon

4002Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts

1564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action

252Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Rationality, universality and justification in digital societies.

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monism, integration, and dualism as general conceptions to handle sociological tensions

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becerra, G., & Castorina, J. A. (2023). Towards an analysis of the epistemic frameworks of big data. Cinta de Moebio, (76), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2023000100050

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

57%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free