How to improve signature schemes

1Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bellare and Micali have shown how to build strong signature schemes from the mere assumption that trapdoor permutation generators exist. Subsequently, Naor and Yung have shown how to weaken the assumption under which a strong signature scheme can be built: it is enough to start from permutations that are one-way rather than trapdoor. In this paper, which is independent from and orthogonal to the work of Naor and Yung, we weaken in a different way the assumption under which a strong signature scheme can be built: it is enough to start from what we call a weak signature scheme (defined below). Weak signature schemes are trapdoor in nature, but they need not be based on permutations. As an application, the Guillou-Quisquater-Simmons signature scheme (a variant on Williams’ and Rabin’s schemes, also defined below) can be used to build a strong signature scheme, whereas it is not clear that it gives rise directly to an efficient trapdoor (or even one-way) permutation generator.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brassard, G. (1990). How to improve signature schemes. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 434 LNCS, pp. 16–22). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46885-4_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free