Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy

46Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Margin resection status is a major risk factor for the development of local recurrence in breast conservation therapy for carcinoma. Tumor bed excision sent as separate orientated cavity margins represents a tool to verify the completeness of the carcinoma resection. We aimed to (1) determine the prevalence of positive cavity margin and its influence on subsequent surgical treatment and (2) identify potential predictive factors for positive cavity margins. From 2003 to 2006, 107 (57 years; 30-88) consecutive patients who underwent a lumpectomy for carcinoma with four orientated cavity margins for carcinoma were selected. Preoperative clinical, radiological and histological data, perioperative macroscopic characteristics and definitive histological analysis results were recorded. Lumpectomy or cavity margins were considered as positive when the distance from carcinoma to the margin was less than or equal to 3 mm. Histological examination of cavity margins showed carcinoma in 38 patients (35%), therefore modifying subsequent surgical therapy in 33 cases. Examination of the cavity margins led (1) to avoiding surgical re-excision in 20 cases (lumpectomy margins were positive and the cavity margins negative), (2) to performing a mastectomy or a re-excision in 13 cases (carcinoma was detected in the cavity margins although the lumpectomy margins were negative or tumor size was superior to 3 cm). Between preoperative and perioperative parameters, US scan and macroscopic size of the tumor were predictive factors for positive cavity margins whereas characteristics of the carcinoma determined on biopsy samples and macroscopic status of the lumpectomy margins were not. Our study confirms that the systematic practice of cavity margin resection avoids surgical re-excision and reduces the likelihood of underestimating the extent of the tumor. © 2009 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy

569Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Significance of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after lumpectomy

549Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: Results of a survey

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: Retrospective study of hospital episode statistics

287Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer

285Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature

105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tengher-Barna, I., Hequet, D., Reboul-Marty, J., Frassati-Biaggi, A., Seince, N., Rodrigues-Faure, A., … Ziol, M. (2009). Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy. Modern Pathology, 22(2), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2008.186

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Researcher 3

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

87%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

7%

Computer Science 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free