Abstract
Griffith et al. do not question the quality of our analysis, but they question our results with respect to the definition of forest we employed. In our response, we explain why the differences we report result from a difference of technique and not of definition, and how anyone can adapt—as we did—our data set to any forest definition and tree cover threshold of interest.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Bastin, J. F., Mollicone, D., Grainger, A., Sparrow, B., Picard, N., Lowe, A., & Castro, R. (2017, November 17). Response to Comment on “The extent of forest in dryland biomes.” Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2079
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free