Assessing anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with peripheral facial palsy: a systematic review

22Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Peripheral facial palsy (PFP) is predominantly a unilateral disorder of the facial nerve, which can lead to psychological disorders that can result in decreased quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to assess anxiety, depression and quality of life symptoms associated with PFP. Data sources: We searched the Medline, PEDro, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases to conduct this systematic review while following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. The search was performed by two independent reviewers, and differences between the two reviewers were resolved by consensus. Study Selection: The search terms used were derived from the combination of the following MeSH terms: “facial paralysis”, “bell palsy”, “anxiety”, “anxiety disorders”, “depression”, “depressive disorders”, “quality of life” and not MeSH: “facial palsy”, “hemifacial paralysis”, “facial paresis”, “Peripheral Facial Paralysis”, using the combination of different Boolean operators (AND/OR). Data Extraction: On November 1st (2019). Data Synthesis: In total, 18 cross-sectional articles and two case-control studies were selected. Conclusions: The cross-sectional articles showed low methodological quality, while the case-control studies showed acceptable methodological quality. Limited evidence suggests that patients with PFP might have increased levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. A qualitative analysis also showed limited evidence that quality of life might be diminished in patients with PFP. PROSPERO: CRD42020159843.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cuenca-Martínez, F., Zapardiel-Sánchez, E., Carrasco-González, E., Touche, R. L., & Suso-Martí, L. (2020, December 1). Assessing anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with peripheral facial palsy: a systematic review. PeerJ. PeerJ Inc. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10449

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free