Prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and hemophilia: Incidental findings and weak points

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Because of the progression of genetics and genomics, the demand for prenatal diagnosis (PD) for inherited genetic diseases has increased. However, several incidental findings may emerge during PD, like misattributed paternity, the evidence of disease in a parent, and the possible misinterpretation of the results because of complex alleles or de novo mutations that have several implications. In a retrospective observational study on all the couples referred to our Medical School (1993–2018) for PD of genetic inherited diseases (n = 1502), we selected the cases of PD for cystic fibrosis (CF, n = 239) and hemophilia A and B (HA, HB, n = 47), revising all incidental findings previously mentioned. We found one case in which a technical error led to PD of carrier in two siblings that were born affected by CF, four cases of misattributed paternity, eight cases of asymptomatic parents revealed as affected by CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR)-related disorders, a case of a novel complex allele that could have caused the diagnosis of CF in a carrier fetus, and a case of a de novo mutation in a mother (already a carrier) that caused hemophilia in a child that PD had revealed as healthy. We present these conditions as clinical cases and discuss the technical, clinical, ethical, and legal aspects to be considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Comegna, M., Maruotti, G. M., Sarno, L., Cernera, G., Gelzo, M., Guida, M., … Castaldo, G. (2020). Prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and hemophilia: Incidental findings and weak points. Diagnostics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10010007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free