The ‘meme’ meme revisited

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

He “meme†concept is usually attributed to Dawkins. It does, however, have a much longer history, predating the acceptance of the “gene†concept in early twentieth century biology. This chapter traces the history of the “meme†meme and explores the role of intentionality. Intentionality. role of —or its exclusion—in the analogies drawn between biological and cultural evolution. There are three main problems with the “meme†meme in its current forms: A taken-for-granted gene-centric view of evolution; a disembodied notion of culture as the transmission of unit “ideasâ€; and the misleading promise of connecting biology and culture that is based on yet another taken-for-granted assumption: That biological and cultural evolution are ultimately two quite separate realms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costall, A. (2015). The ‘meme’ meme revisited. In Epistemological Dimensions of Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 89–101). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1387-9_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free