Association between reported aetiology of central nervous system infections and the speciality of study investigators-A bias compartmental syndrome?

1Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Conventional descriptions of central nervous system (CNS) infections are variably categorized into clinical syndromes for patient investigation, management and research. Aetiologies of the most commonly recognized syndromes, encephalitis and meningitis, tend to be attributed predominantly to viruses and bacteria, respectively. Methods: A systematic review was performed of aetiological studies of CNS syndromes and data extracted on reported author specialities. Results: The analysis identified an association between the author's speciality and the CNS syndrome studied, with a tendency for virologists to study encephalitis and microbiologists to study meningitis. Conclusions: We suggest there is bias in study design. Stronger multidisciplinary collaboration in CNS infection research is needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bharucha, T., Vickers, S., Ming, D., Leed, S. J., Dubot-Pérèsa, A., de Lamballerie, X., & Newton, P. N. (2017). Association between reported aetiology of central nervous system infections and the speciality of study investigators-A bias compartmental syndrome? Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 111(12), 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/try008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free