Are Message Passing Neural Networks Really Helpful for Knowledge Graph Completion?

6Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Knowledge graphs (KGs) facilitate a wide variety of applications. Despite great efforts in creation and maintenance, even the largest KGs are far from complete. Hence, KG completion (KGC) has become one of the most crucial tasks for KG research. Recently, considerable literature in this space has centered around the use of Message Passing (Graph) Neural Networks (MPNNs), to learn powerful embeddings. The success of these methods is naturally attributed to the use of MPNNs over simpler multi-layer perceptron (MLP) models, given their additional message passing (MP) component. In this work, we find that surprisingly, simple MLP models are able to achieve comparable performance to MPNNs, suggesting that MP may not be as crucial as previously believed. With further exploration, we show careful scoring function and loss function design has a much stronger influence on KGC model performance. This suggests a conflation of scoring function design, loss function design, and MP in prior work, with promising insights regarding the scalability of state-of-the-art KGC methods today, as well as careful attention to more suitable MP designs for KGC tasks tomorrow. Our codes are publicly available at: https://github.com/Juanhui28/Are_MPNNs_helpful.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, J., Shomer, H., Ding, J., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Shah, N., … Yin, D. (2023). Are Message Passing Neural Networks Really Helpful for Knowledge Graph Completion? In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 10696–10711). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.597

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free