An Investigation Into the Appropriateness of a Procedural Negotiated Syllabus for Adult Vocational Learners

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present mixed-methods study investigated the readiness of teachers and adult learners at a vocational centre in the United Arab Emirates to implement a negotiated English syllabus. The study addressed two main questions: 1) are teachers and learners at the Vocational Training Centre ready to implement a negotiated syllabus? And 2) does the negotiated syllabus implementation lead to improvement in learners’ motivation? Results showed the significant potential of a negotiated syllabus in enhancing learners’ motivation by making them part of the decision-makers’ circle regarding the components of an intended English syllabus. On the other hand, learners, teachers and management systems face challenges that must first be overcome to succeed in implementing negotiated syllabi. The findings of this study support the value of involving learners in classroom decisions, which is expected to make them feel responsible for their learning.

References Powered by Scopus

Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview

2988Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Three Approaches to Task‐Based Syllabus Design

358Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Student voice in higher education: A negotiated curriculum in the foreign language classroom

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Assaf, M. A., Zabadi, M. I., & Abu-Ayyash, E. A. S. (2022). An Investigation Into the Appropriateness of a Procedural Negotiated Syllabus for Adult Vocational Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(6), 1166–1176. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.04

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 4

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

43%

Psychology 2

29%

Linguistics 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 64

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free