The Insulin Cardioplegia Trial: Myocardial protection for urgent coronary artery bypass grafting

45Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Small, nonrandomized clinical trials have demonstrated a beneficial effect of solutions containing insulin and glucose on the recovery of myocardial metabolism and ventricular function after cardioplegic arrest and reperfusion. However, no large, blinded, randomized study has yet determined the effects of insulin-enhanced cardioplegia on clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: The Insulin Cardioplegia Trial was designed to evaluate the clinical impact of insulin-enhanced cardioplegia on patients at high risk undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for unstable angina. A total of 1127 patients were randomly assigned at operation to receive cardioplegic solution supplemented with 10 IU/L insulin (n = 557) or placebo (n = 570). All personnel with direct patient contact were blinded to randomization group. Results: Overall operative mortality was 2.2%, with no significant differences between groups. The prevalences of postoperative low output syndrome (insulin 10.4%, placebo 9.7%, P = .7) and enzymatic myocardial infarction (insulin 21.0%, placebo 18.8%, P = .3) were not different between groups. The primary composite outcome of low output syndrome and/or enzymatic myocardial infarction revealed no difference between groups (insulin 30.0%, placebo 26.3%, P = .2). Conclusions: Despite encouraging results from smaller, nonrandomized studies, the Insulin Cardioplegia Trial failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit of insulin-enhanced cardioplegic solution for patients undergoing high-risk isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rao, V., Christakis, G. T., Weisel, R. D., Ivanov, J., Borger, M. A., & Cohen, G. (2002). The Insulin Cardioplegia Trial: Myocardial protection for urgent coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 123(5), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2002.121686

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free