Peter Geschiere, The perils of belonging: autochthony, citizenship, and exclusion in Africa and Europe

  • Pina-Cabral J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
160Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite being told that we now live in a cosmopolitan world, more and more people have begun to assert their identities in ways that are deeply rooted in the local. These claims of autochthony—meaning “born from the soil”—seek to establish an irrefutable, primordial right to belong and are often employed in politically charged attempts to exclude outsiders. In The Perils of Belonging, Peter Geschiere traces the concept of autochthony back to the classical period and incisively explores the idea in two very different contexts: Cameroon and the Netherlands. In both countries, the momentous economic and political changes following the end of the cold war fostered anxiety over migration. For Cameroonians, the question of who belongs where rises to the fore in political struggles between different tribes, while the Dutch invoke autochthony in fierce debates over the integration of immigrants. This fascinating comparative perspective allows Geschiere to examine the emotional appeal of autochthony—as well as its dubious historical basis—and to shed light on a range of important issues, such as multiculturalism, national citizenship, and migration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pina-Cabral, J. de. (2010). Peter Geschiere, The perils of belonging: autochthony, citizenship, and exclusion in Africa and Europe. Etnografica, (vol. 14 (1)), 199–201. https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.369

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free