An integrated approach to rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance using liquid culture and molecular methods in Russia

50Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the feasibility, cost and performance of rapid tuberculosis (TB) molecular and culture systems, in a high multidrug-resistant TB (MDR TB) middle-income region (Samara, Russia) and provide evidence for WHO policy change. Methods: Performance and cost evaluation was conducted to compare the BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 system for culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) and molecular systems for TB diagnosis, resistance to isoniazid and rifampin, and MDR TB identification compared to conventional Lowenstein-Jensen culture assays. Findings: 698 consecutive patients (2487 sputum samples) with risk factors for drug-resistant tuberculosis were recruited. Overall M. tuberculosis complex culture positivity rates were 31.6% (787/2487) in MGIT and 27.1% (675/2487) in LJ (90.5% and 83.2% for smear-positive specimens). In total, 809 cultures of M. tuberculosis complex were isolated by any method. Median time to detection was 14 days for MGIT and 36 days for LJ (10 and 33 days for smear positive specimens) and indirect DST in MGIT took 9 days compared to 21 days on LJ. There was good concordance between DST on LJ and MGIT (96.8% for rifampin and 95.6% for isoniazid). Both molecular hybridization assay results correlated well with MGIT DST results, although molecular assays generally yielded higher rates of resistance (by approximately 3% for both isoniazid and rifampin). Conclusion: With effective planning and logistics, the MGIT 960 and molecular based methodologies can be successfully introduced into a reference laboratory setting in a middle incidence country. High rates of MDR TB in the Russian Federation make the introduction of such assays particularly useful. © 2009 Balabanova et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Mycobacterial speciation of cultures isolated from sputum specimens.
  • Table 1. MGIT and LJ culture positive sputum specimens by microscopy result (MTC only)*.
  • Table 2. Recovery rates of each method and concordance compared to all positive cultures (MTC only)*.
  • Figure 2. Time (days) to culture and DST results for mycobacterial cultures.
  • Table 3. Phenotypic first-line DST comparing LJ and MGIT methodology.*
  • Table 4. Comparative agreement of LJ and MGIT-based DST methods.
  • Table 5. Comparison of molecular methods with MGIT culture results for isoniazid and rifampin resistance.
  • Table 6. Comparison of molecular methods with LJ culture results for isoniazid and rifampin resistance.

References Powered by Scopus

Evaluation of the GenoType MTBDRplus assay for rifampin and isoniazid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical specimens

315Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multicenter evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system for recovery of mycobacteria

267Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical outcome of individualised treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Latvia: A retrospective cohort study

255Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Management of patients with multidrugresistant/ extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Europe: A TBNET consensus statement

260Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnosis of tuberculosis and drug resistance: What can new tools bring us?

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rapid diagnostics of tuberculosis and drug resistance in the industrialized world: Clinical and public health benefits and barriers to implementation

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balabanova, Y., Drobniewski, F., Nikolayevskyy, V., Kruuner, A., Malomanova, N., Simak, T., … Fedorin, I. (2009). An integrated approach to rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance using liquid culture and molecular methods in Russia. PLoS ONE, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007129

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

49%

Researcher 33

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 43

59%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

18%

Immunology and Microbiology 11

15%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0