THE MORAL CHALLENGE OF GREEN TECHNOLOGY

Abstract

Sustainable development requires that private corporations adopt "green technology", which in many cases also improves firm profitability. When this occurs, the actions are simply good business and are morally neutral - neither good nor bad. If "greening" is expected to harm the company financially then green technology is typically not adopted, and this can be morally problematic. In this paper we discuss DuPont CEO Chad Holliday's decision not to withdraw from the market or redesign the highly profitable product Teflon® even though it may present significant public health concerns. We conclude that the unregulated free market system is incompatible with our search for sustainability. Experience has shown that if green technology threatens profits, green technology loses and profitability wins. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences is the property of Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)