Physical features vs meaning: A difference in decay

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The encoding of either physical or semantic features of words was biased in an intentional learning situation. A modified recognition test was then employed to assess the effectiveness of this study manipulation and its consequences for retention. The Ss were required to select test items that were either physically similar, semantically similar, or identical to a study word. Results revealed that Ss biased toward physical encoding were more successful in selecting physically similar than semantically similar test items, while the opposite was true of Ss biased toward semantic encoding. The Ss in the two study conditions did not differ in their ability to select test items that were identical to a study word. This pattern of results was interpreted as evidence that semantic and physical information can be equally well retained over the long term. Limits on the generality of prior findings of rapid decay for physical information are discussed. © 1975 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jacoby, L. L. (1975). Physical features vs meaning: A difference in decay. Memory & Cognition, 3(3), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212906

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free