Re-ranking in the context of CBIR: A comparative study

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There are many efforts put, in the last years, on the re-ranking mechanism, in the context of content based-image retrieval (CBIR), aiming to improve the results answered after the first search based on image features. In this paper, we address this scheme of re-ranking categorized here into two directions: reranking based on pseudo relevance feedback and re-ranking with relevance feedback information. Each of the cited categories contains four kinds of re-ranking: (i) re-ranking through refinement of the initial query, (ii) re-ranking through updating the weights of utilized signatures/similarities, (iii) re-ranking through classification (non-supervised or supervised) and (iv) re-ranking through rerating algorithms. The comparative study revealed that MVRA is the best in terms of pseudo relevance feedback and that Incremental KNN outperforms the considered methods for relevance feedback.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mosbah, M., & Boucheham, B. (2017). Re-ranking in the context of CBIR: A comparative study. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 569, pp. 297–307). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56535-4_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free