The Persistence of Prejudice: Voters Strongly Penalize Candidates with HIV

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Forty million people around the world and more than one million in the United States live with HIV. Despite the gains in the prevention and treatment of HIV due to medical advances and community advocacy, HIV/AIDS continues to claim lives and disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Stigma against people with HIV remains powerful. While individuals with HIV have gained some visibility in the media, the scarcity of politicians with HIV is striking. This article analyzes a possible reason: voter bias. We examine voters’ reactions to political candidates with HIV using original nationally representative survey experiments from the United States, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Voters penalize candidates with HIV by 10–12 percentage points in the three countries. Prejudice, electability concerns, and the moral judgment that candidates are responsible for their HIV+ status explain bias. The lack of descriptive representation remains an obstacle to improved policy outcomes for this marginalized community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magni, G., & Reynolds, A. (2022). The Persistence of Prejudice: Voters Strongly Penalize Candidates with HIV. Political Behavior, 44(4), 1843–1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09687-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free