Comparison of technologies for CO 2 capture from cement production—Part 2: Cost analysis

198Citations
Citations of this article
510Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO 2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO 2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO 2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO 2 avoided is between 42 €/t CO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/t CO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/t CO2 . Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO 2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations.

References Powered by Scopus

Techno-economic analysis of calcium looping processes for low CO<inf>2</inf> emission cement plants

145Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A techno-economic case study of CO<inf>2</inf> capture, transport and storage chain from a cement plant in Norway

111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CO <sup>2</sup> capture from cement plants using oxyfired precalcination and/ or calcium looping

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

CO<inf>2</inf>Capture at Medium to High Temperature Using Solid Oxide-Based Sorbents: Fundamental Aspects, Mechanistic Insights, and Recent Advances

273Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review on CO<inf>2</inf>capture and sequestration in the construction industry: Emerging approaches and commercialised technologies

177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward electrochemical synthesis of cement—An electrolyzer-based process for decarbonating CaCO<inf>3</inf> while producing useful gas streams

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gardarsdottir, S. O., De Lena, E., Romano, M., Roussanaly, S., Voldsund, M., Pérez-Calvo, J. F., … Cinti, G. (2019). Comparison of technologies for CO 2 capture from cement production—Part 2: Cost analysis. Energies, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030542

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 127

62%

Researcher 68

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemical Engineering 60

32%

Engineering 55

30%

Energy 51

27%

Environmental Science 20

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free