Omics' biomarkers associated with chronic low back pain: Protocol of a retrospective longitudinal study

17Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction Chronic low back pain (CLBP) produces considerable direct costs as well as indirect burdens for society, industry and health systems. CLBP is characterised by heterogeneity, inclusion of several pain syndromes, different underlying molecular pathologies and interaction with psychosocial factors that leads to a range of clinical manifestations. There is still much to understand in the underlying pathological processes and the non-psychosocial factors which account for differences in outcomes. Biomarkers that may be objectively used for diagnosis and personalised, targeted and cost-effective treatment are still lacking. Therefore, any data that may be obtained at the-omics' level (glycomics, Activomics and genome-wide association studies-GWAS) may be helpful to use as dynamic biomarkers for elucidating CLBP pathogenesis and may ultimately provide prognostic information too. By means of a retrospective, observational, case-cohort, multicentre study, we aim to investigate new promising biomarkers potentially able to solve some of the issues related to CLBP. Methods and analysis The study follows a two-phase, 1:2 case-control model. A total of 12 000 individuals (4000 cases and 8000 controls) will be enrolled; clinical data will be registered, with particular attention to pain characteristics and outcomes of pain treatments. Blood samples will be collected to perform-omics studies. The primary objective is to recognise genetic variants associated with CLBP; secondary objectives are to study glycomics and Activomics profiles associated with CLBP. Ethics and dissemination The study is part of the PainOMICS project funded by European Community in the Seventh Framework Programme. The study has been approved from competent ethical bodies and copies of approvals were provided to the European Commission before starting the study. Results of the study will be reviewed by the Scientific Board and Ethical Committee of the PainOMICS Consortium. The scientific results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number NCT02037789; Pre-results.

References Powered by Scopus

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

5395Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain

2169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The global burden of low back pain: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study

2039Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Defining the genetic control of human blood plasma N-glycome using genome-wide association study

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CYP2D6 genotype can help to predict effectiveness and safety during opioid treatment for chronic low back pain: Results from a retrospective study in an italian cohort

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Whole blood transcriptomic profiles can differentiate vulnerability to chronic low back pain

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allegri, M., De Gregori, M., Minella, C. E., Klersy, C., Wang, W., Sim, M., … Fanelli, G. (2016). Omics’ biomarkers associated with chronic low back pain: Protocol of a retrospective longitudinal study. BMJ Open, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012070

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

55%

Researcher 13

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

49%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

23%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

15%

Neuroscience 6

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0