A preliminary exploration of the efficacy of gentamicin sponges in the prevention and treatment of wound infections

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to construct drug-loading and drug-releasing quantitative equations for gentamicin sponges in addition to realizing a gentamicin sponge for wound infection prevention and treatment. Methods: Sterile sponges were cut into pieces of 1×1 × 0.5 cm and immersed in 40, 16, 8, 4, 1.6, 0.8, or 0 mg/mL of gentamicin solution for 12, 24, 48, 96, or 120 h to evaluate their gentamicin loading. The sponges were subsequently immersed in the gentamicin solution of different concentrations for 48 h, air-dried, and then immersed in 10 mL of 0.9% physiological saline to evaluate the gentamicin release. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used to explore the sponges’ infection prevention scheme. In addition, a rat femur fracture with wound infection model was used to assess the infection treatment scheme. Results: The antibacterial zone sizes of the sponges immersed in 40, 16, 8, 4, 1.6, and 0.8 mg/mL of the gentamicin solution were larger than those of the 0 mg/mL air-dried sponge, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.01, respectively). The rats in the 40, 16, and 8 mg/mL air-dried sponge groups had no wound suppuration in either the MSSA or P. aeruginosa rat infection models. Conclusion: A quantified equation for the sponges’ gentamicin loading and release was achieved with high accuracy. Furthermore, we recommend the 40, 16, or 8 mg/mL air-dried sponge for the treatment of wounds with antibiotic-sensitive bacterial infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Y., & Zhou, J. (2021). A preliminary exploration of the efficacy of gentamicin sponges in the prevention and treatment of wound infections. Infection and Drug Resistance, 14, 2633–2644. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S315105

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free