Anatomic vs. Acquired image frame discordance in spectral domain optical coherence tomography minimum rim measurements

53Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify the effects of using the fovea to Bruch's membrane opening (FoBMO) axis as the nasal-temporal midline for 30u sectoral (clock-hour) spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) optic nerve head (ONH) minimum rim width (MRW) and area (MRA) calculations. Methods: The internal limiting membrane and BMO were delineated within 24 radial ONH B-scans in 222 eyes of 222 participants with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. For each eye the fovea was marked within the infrared reflectance image, the FoBMO angle (h) relative to the acquired image frame (AIF) horizontal was calculated, the ONH was divided into 30usectors using a FoBMO or AIF nasal/temporal axis, and SDOCT MRW and MRA were quantified within each FoBMO vs. AIF sector. For each sector, focal rim loss was calculated as the MRW and MRA gradients (i.e. the difference between the value for that sector and the one clockwise to it divided by 30u). Sectoral FoBMO vs. AIF discordance was calculated as the difference between the FoBMO and AIF values for each sector. Generalized estimating equations were used to predict the eyes and sectors of maximum FoBMO vs. AIF discordance. Results: The mean FoBMO angle was 26.664.2u (range: 217u to +7u). FoBMO vs. AIF discordance in sectoral mean MRW and MRA was significant for 7 of 12 and 6 of 12 sectors, respectively (p,0.05, Wilcoxon test, Bonferroni correction). Eyespecific, FoBMO vs. AIF sectoral discordance was predicted by sectoral rim gradient (p,0.001) and FoBMO angle (p,0.001) and achieved maximum values of 83% for MRW and 101% for MRA. Conclusions: Using the FoBMO axis as the nasal-temporal axis to regionalize the ONH rather than a line parallel to the AIF horizontal axis significantly influences clock-hour SDOCT rim values. This effect is greatest in eyes with large FoBMO angles and sectors with focal rim loss. ©2014 He et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, L., Ren, R., Yang, H., Hardin, C., Reyes, L., Reynaud, J., … Burgoyne, C. F. (2014). Anatomic vs. Acquired image frame discordance in spectral domain optical coherence tomography minimum rim measurements. PLoS ONE, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free