Overcoming barriers to translation from experimental stroke models

7Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The current understanding of stroke pathophysiology and the recognition of advantages and disadvantages of animal models are providing a renewed incentive for translational research. However, when neuroprotective drugs that work in animal models for adult stroke fail when tested in humans, this can result in major setbacks for developing stroke therapy. In this review, we will define key challenges and complexities in translational stroke research. In part 1, we focus on how to choose an appropriate experimental stroke model, role of species, strain, sex and age of animals, morphological and functional differences between the brain of humans and animals, and protection of cerebral gray matter (instead of both gray and white matter). In part 2, we discuss preclinical pitfalls, including physiological monitoring, role of anesthesia, dosing and side effects, therapeutic window, and outcome measures. In part 3, we focus on the ischemic penumbra as a target of neuroprotection in experimental and clinical stroke. By recognizing the advances in stroke basic science, translational research is moving forward in the development of new effective acute stroke treatments. Success in this endeavor requires increased interactions and cooperation between basic scientists and clinical researchers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belayev, L. (2012). Overcoming barriers to translation from experimental stroke models. In Translational Stroke Research: From Target Selection to Clinical Trials (pp. 471–492). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9530-8_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free