Invited commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias

148Citations
Citations of this article
269Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Causal inferences about the effect of an exposure on an outcome may be biased by errors in the measurement of either the exposure or the outcome. Measurement errors of exposure and outcome can be classified into 4 types: independent nondifferential, dependent nondifferential, independent differential, and dependent differential. Here the authors describe how causal diagrams can be used to represent these 4 types of measurement bias and discuss some problems that arise when using measured exposure variables (e.g., body mass index) to make inferences about the causal effects of unmeasured constructs (e.g., "adiposity"). The authors conclude that causal diagrams need to be used to represent biases arising not only from confounding and selection but also from measurement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernán, M. A., & Cole, S. R. (2009, October). Invited commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp293

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free